Top Gear Bugatti Veyron vs Mclaren f1 (second battle)
this is the Bugatti veyron vs. the mclaren f1. this is the for the end.the is the best race in the history and it will stay like that untle the release of new bugatti veyron witch will have 1200 hp witch will rule the world.i wish that someone will tell me where i can find a race between the SSC Ultimate Aero and the Barabus TKR
who does a mile long drag race anyways haha!
@mlgprotipsy Really??
@coolman84567 Koenigsegg argera r is 273 mph…
@Jesse0010110 oh lame dude i was pulling for the Mclaren my favorite of the two but the Bugatti is an amazing car also
i thought the F40 was the first carbon fibre bodied car…
The Mclaren f1 would have won in the quarter mile.
I’ll take the one with a clutch and shifter, I prefer to do my own rev matches thank you very much.
ALL YOU BUGATTI HATERS CAN SUCK IT INCLUDING THE IDIOTS WITH THE TOP COMMENTS
@ijnec I don’t think so the Bugatti Veyron Super sport came out and it will do 268mph so BUgatii Wins
Put them on a track and we will see who is who….. Nurburgring for example…? I WOULD PAY TO SEE THAT!!!!!
Sorry Bugatti! Koenigsegg agera r just owned you
Now do SSC VS Supersport
@uditvaish porduction, production…..dude…you get the point…it´s the same thing
@juancho939 its not porduction its “production”!
@fctsui57 in that race…yes…cause Richard didn´t use lauch control
using the launch control, the 0-60 time of the veyron is 2.5 secs…the Mclaren´s like 3.6 or something
Koenigsegg is going to FUCK UP that veyron….6 world records broken with that car!!!! that oncludes a 200 MPH time of about 17.5 secs….THAT´S 2 SECONDS FASTER THAN THE VEYRON
@ryvoltz maybe you´re right…sorry about that man =). Anyways…the ferrari may have a higher hp output per litre….but the mclaren has much more torque…so much in fact, as mentioned in the vid that a new transmition had to be developed to withstand it
I wonder… The Veyron Supersport vs the Koenigsegg Agera R… which would win…
i would have the F1 over the veyron
@juancho939 I thought I had read somewhere that the McLaren F1 had a supercharger. I was wrong, though. But I do know something about cars. Enough to tell you that the McLaren is the fastest naturally aspirated car, but it doesn’t have the best naturally aspirated engine. You see, Ferrari’s F355 had 107,3bhp per litre, against McLaren’s 103,4bhp per litre. Just for you to take it easier when posting a comment.
Come on people don’t be so mean on the veyron..
I myself used to think that mclaren was the best but the veyron well It lost here coz of richard, accept it
veyron not only has a higher top speed but accelerates much faster as well + it has got loads of comfort and tech as well, it is the most comfortable car to be in, in the mclaren one has to use headphones to communicate not in the veyron, n it can do 253mph even after a couple of decades, it is designed to live for decades n still max..
I’ll still take the mclaren. try cornering in the bugatti. or stopping.
From 0 – 60 mph, the F1 is faster, right??
@ryvoltz WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?!?!?!?1 dude, you don´t know anything about cars!!!! that is like saying the engine in the Bugatti is a V16!! NO THE V12 IN THE MCLAREN IS NOT SUPERCHARGED!!!! The mclaren is the fastest NATURALLY ASPIRATED car in the world! that means NO turbos nor superchargers
IM IN LUV WITH THE MCLAREN F1 SINCE I WAS 5